Battle for the Red Zone

The creation of a Red Zone has kicked off a battle between advertisers and editors.
To an advertising manager of a site, that Red Zone is his top selling place. Armed with the weaponry of Eyetrack, he could lay seige to companies and legitamately demand large wads of cash. They are paying for the 'in' spot on the site after all.
But then you have the editor. He's looking at that Red Zone thinking it is the best place to showcase his top talent, his leading story. He's thinking that if this is the place they look first, then it is the best chance you have of keeping someone on the site.
Hence, a battle ensues between the money and ideas. Can ideas survive without money? Is an idea worth anything if it cannot be communicated due to lack of funds?
Many sites seem to have found a comprimise. SkyNews shares it's Red Zone out between the content and the ad's quite effectively. The ad man gets his money and the editor gets his content across. Sure they'd rather each other wasn't there, but that's compromise (the world could learn a thing or two from the internet). So rather than the Red Zone being a battle ground, it is more the ecosystem for a symbiotic relationship between the main players on the internet.




